1994 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (138 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1994 Lotus Elan.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lotus Elan.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Lotus Elan 2003 Mazda 6
Make Lotus Mazda
Model Elan 6
Year Released 1994 2003
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1588 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 204 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1020 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 3810 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2680 mm