1994 Lotus Elan vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (144 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 396 kg more than 1994 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lotus Elan | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 5 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2760 mm |