1994 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lotus Elan (163 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Lotus Elan | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Elan | Cruze |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2685 mm |