1994 Mahindra Armada vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1994 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1994 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 970 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1994 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mahindra Armada | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3780 mm |