1994 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1400 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Mahindra | Tata |
Model | Armada | Nano |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3099 mm |