1994 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 323. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 92 kg more than 1994 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-Z (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 323. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 323 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 323 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2435 mm |