1994 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 323. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1209 kg more than 1994 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 323. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 323 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 323 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 2364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2916 mm |