1994 Mazda 626 vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 626 | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | 120 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |