1994 Mazda 626 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 190 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (167 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (160 Nm). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3030 mm |
