1994 Mazda 626 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
