1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 626 | 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 626 | 146 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 19.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |