1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 277 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
