1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 236 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
