1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 626 | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Mazda | Samsung |
Model | 626 | SM3 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |