1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda 626 weights approximately 392 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 626 | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 626 | Smart |
Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |