1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda 626 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 626 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
