1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 716 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Mazda 626 2012 Jeep Wrangler
Make Mazda Jeep
Model 626 Wrangler
Year Released 1994 2012
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 285 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 352 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1936 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4404 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1877 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2946 mm