1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 597 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda 626 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 626 | XTS |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2837 mm |