1994 Mazda 626 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox

To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 560 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Mazda 626 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
Make Mazda Chevrolet
Model 626 Equinox
Year Released 1994 2013
Body Type Station Wagon Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 167 Nm 233 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98 mm 98 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1780 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4771 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2857 mm