1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 466 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
| Model | Midge | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
