1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1968 Simca 1100
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1968 Simca 1100. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1968 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 100 kg more than 1968 Simca 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Simca 1100. (91 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 1968 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | Midge | 1100 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |