1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1979 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 65 kg more than 1979 Opel Ascona.
Because 1979 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 1979 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Midge | Ascona |
Year Released | 1994 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |