1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Manta would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 Opel Manta.
Because 1982 Opel Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 1982 Opel Manta | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Midge | Manta |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |