1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1982 Peugeot 505
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Peugeot 505. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Peugeot 505 would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Peugeot 505 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Peugeot 505 weights approximately 193 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 1982 Peugeot 505 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Peugeot 505. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 1982 Peugeot 505 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Midge | 505 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |