1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Seat Ronda (122 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | Midge | Ronda |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |