1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 346 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | Midge | MK VI |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 41 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
