1994 Mazda Midge vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (81 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 369 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Midge | Smart |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
