1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2000 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2000 Opel Meriva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,684 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Opel Meriva. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Meriva weights approximately 374 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Meriva (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2000 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | Midge | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1393 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
