1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 456 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rover 75 (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | Midge | 75 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |