1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota RunX weights approximately 72 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (147 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Midge | RunX |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1122 kg |
