1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2006 Renault Logan
To start off, 2006 Renault Logan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Logan weights approximately 46 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2006 Renault Logan | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | Midge | Logan |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
