1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge. 2010 Buick LaCrosse has automatic transmission and 1994 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1994 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Buick LaCrosse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | Mazda | Buick |
| Model | Midge | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5001 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1504 mm |
