1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (102 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 273 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Hyundai |
| Model | Midge | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1323 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
