1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2011 Citroen C1
To start off, 2011 Citroen C1 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 67 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C1 weights approximately 506 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2011 Citroen C1 | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | Midge | C1 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
