1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Midge | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Midge | Colorado |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |