1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2012 Kia Picanto
To start off, 2012 Kia Picanto is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2012 Kia Picanto. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Picanto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 116 kg more than 2012 Kia Picanto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Picanto. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Picanto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2012 Kia Picanto | |
| Make | Mazda | Kia |
| Model | Midge | Picanto |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1086 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
