1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge. 2012 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1994 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1994 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Midge | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
