1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2013 BMW M3

To start off, 2013 BMW M3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M3 (408 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M3 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge. 1994 Mazda Midge has automatic transmission and 2013 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2013 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mazda Midge will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: