1994 Mazda Midge vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (168 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 533 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Midge | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | Midge | 6 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1499 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
