1994 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1957 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1994 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1957 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda MX-3 | 1957 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | MX-3 | Corona |
Year Released | 1994 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 29 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2410 mm |