1994 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda MX-3 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | MX-3 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2946 mm |