1994 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2000 Tata Estate
To start off, 2000 Tata Estate is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 171 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Estate weights approximately 326 kg more than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata Estate. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata Estate.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda RX-7 | 2000 Tata Estate | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | RX-7 | Estate |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |