1994 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1994 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1994 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (241 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda RX-7 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-7 | S40 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |