1994 Mazda Sentia vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1994 Mazda Sentia is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Sentia (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Sentia should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 315 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Sentia (245 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Sentia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mazda Sentia | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Sentia | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2954 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |