1994 Mazda Sentia vs. 1979 Volvo 66

To start off, 1994 Mazda Sentia is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Sentia (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Sentia should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Sentia (245 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Sentia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66. 1994 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1979 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1979 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: