1994 Mazda Sentia vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Sentia (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Sentia should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 624 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Sentia (245 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 1994 Mazda Sentia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mazda Sentia | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Sentia | Caserta |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2954 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2460 mm |
