1994 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mercedes-Benz E (174 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1994 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | E | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1477 mm |
