1994 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Mazda MazdaSpeed3
To start off, 2012 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda MazdaSpeed3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Mazda MazdaSpeed3 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
| Model | E | MazdaSpeed3 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4973 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4511 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1461 mm |
