1994 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | E | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4973 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1712 mm |
