1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC vs. 2006 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 MG ZT-T is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT-T (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC weights approximately 235 kg more than 2006 MG ZT-T.
Because 2006 MG ZT-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG ZT-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC has automatic transmission and 2006 MG ZT-T has manual transmission. 2006 MG ZT-T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC | 2006 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
Model | MCC | ZT-T |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 4599 cc |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1815 kg |